Fujita/ Injen/ Takeda - 8thAccord

jasonfridlund · 05-18-2009, 09:57 PM

I know they are all good quality. But i have heard of some CEL problems with fujita. The fujita is CAI, the Injen is CAI, and the takeda is short ram...takeda claims 15 hp and 12 tQ..but IDK..i dont think that's possible w/out an exhaust system.

As far as flow dynamics, a column of air can only move as fast as the slowest part w/out becoming irregular in its flow pattern. So I have to imagine that any intake is only going to give about 5-7hp max..w/ exhaust maybe a total of 20hp if ur stock was really restrictive.

So which one do you guys think would be the best overall? Any opinions would help..that's just my 2 cents!

Bobey10 · 05-20-2009, 10:24 AM

It seems to me that Honda has made it difficult to upgrade the air box. I just don't feel like an after market CAI would be THAT much better than what comes already installed. My roommate is an HVAC engineer and knows about air pressure in a closed system and flow and all that. I'll have him take a look at it and see what his thoughts are.

So far, I have dropped a K&N air filter in. This upgrade hasn't done anything noticeably different for me. Has anyone gone on a short drive with the filter completely removed? I've run my motorcycle with out any air components on it just to see what it is like to be completely free of air resistance. It was rather noticeable on that...

Does anyone know what the average temperature difference is between SRI and CAI? Or the percent oxygen per set volume of air translated?

Neochron · 05-22-2009, 11:33 AM

Actually some of the accord owners are seeing some impressive results with the injen. IDK about takeda however.

05-18-2009, 09:57 PM	#1 (permalink)
jasonfridlund Junior Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Age: 18 Posts: 7 iTrader: (0)	Fujita/ Injen/ Takeda I know they are all good quality. But i have heard of some CEL problems with fujita. The fujita is CAI, the Injen is CAI, and the takeda is short ram...takeda claims 15 hp and 12 tQ..but IDK..i dont think that's possible w/out an exhaust system. As far as flow dynamics, a column of air can only move as fast as the slowest part w/out becoming irregular in its flow pattern. So I have to imagine that any intake is only going to give about 5-7hp max..w/ exhaust maybe a total of 20hp if ur stock was really restrictive. So which one do you guys think would be the best overall? Any opinions would help..that's just my 2 cents!
jasonfridlund is offline

05-20-2009, 10:24 AM	#2 (permalink)
Bobey10 Junior Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Rochester, NY Age: 24 Posts: 13 iTrader: (0)	It seems to me that Honda has made it difficult to upgrade the air box. I just don't feel like an after market CAI would be THAT much better than what comes already installed. My roommate is an HVAC engineer and knows about air pressure in a closed system and flow and all that. I'll have him take a look at it and see what his thoughts are. So far, I have dropped a K&N air filter in. This upgrade hasn't done anything noticeably different for me. Has anyone gone on a short drive with the filter completely removed? I've run my motorcycle with out any air components on it just to see what it is like to be completely free of air resistance. It was rather noticeable on that... Does anyone know what the average temperature difference is between SRI and CAI? Or the percent oxygen per set volume of air translated? Last edited by Bobey10 : 05-20-2009 at 10:29 AM.
Bobey10 is offline

05-22-2009, 11:33 AM	#3 (permalink)
Neochron Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Age: 27 Posts: 25 iTrader: (0)	Actually some of the accord owners are seeing some impressive results with the injen. IDK about takeda however.
Neochron is offline

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)